Homoptera
Homoptera, an order of insects encompassing treehoppers, planthoppers, and their allies, has attracted systematic attention in the Malay region primarily through the documentation of island endemism and the description of new species from poorly surveyed archipelagos. The most substantial body of work in the Society’s literature concerns the Mentawi Islands, a group lying 90 to 130 kilometres off the west coast of Sumatra, where coordinated expeditions in 1924 yielded material that demonstrated a high degree of faunal distinctiveness attributable to the islands’ deep-water isolation from the Sunda shelf [1, p. 393]. The order is represented in the records by two major taxonomic contributions: a brief note on Membracidae (treehoppers) by W. D. Funkhouser [2] and a more extensive account of Fulgoroidea (planthoppers) by F. Muir [1], both drawn from the same September to November 1924 expedition conducted under the auspices of the Raffles Museum, Singapore, and the Zoological Museum at Buitenzorg [1, p. 392].
Biogeographical Context and the Mentawi Expedition
The Mentawi Islands—comprising Siberut, Sipora, North Pagi, and South Pagi—occupy a position of particular biogeographical interest. Siberut is approximately 110 kilometres long and 50 kilometres broad, with its northern extremity at 1° South latitude; the other three islands are roughly equal in size and together smaller than Siberut [1, p. 392]. The archipelago is separated from the Sumatran mainland by the Mentawi Basin, where depths reach 1000 to 2000 metres, and is surrounded by water 200 to 1000 metres deep—far exceeding the 75-metre threshold of the Sunda shelf [1, p. 393]. This deep-water isolation, Muir argues, renders the islands’ fauna “quite as distinct from each other and from the rest of Malaysia as the larger areas of that sub-region are from each other” [1, p. 393]. The high endemism previously observed on the nearby Nias Island provided the expectation that the Mentawi group would yield a similarly differentiated fauna, and the results confirm this [1, p. 393].
The 1924 expedition was a coordinated multi-taxa survey of the archipelago’s biodiversity. By 1926, contributions on flora, birds, reptiles, and amphibians had already appeared, with the Homoptera papers forming part of the broader “Spolia Mentawiensia” series [1, p. 393]. The collection was made by C. Boden Kloss, H. H. Karny, and N. Smedley, working with native collectors from the government stations at Siberut and Sioban (Sipora), and also from the sea-shore, swamps, cultivated areas, and accessible hills [1, p. 392]. The expedition of fifteen men suffered near-universal malaria despite quinine prophylaxis, underscoring the difficulty of fieldwork in the archipelago [1, p. 392].
Membracidae: Treehoppers of the Mentawi Group
Funkhouser’s 1928 note [2] reports on Membracidae collected during the 1924 expedition, with Karny credited as having secured the majority of the specimens [2, p. 13]. The note describes one new species, Anchonoides sordidus, a very dark, nearly black treehopper from Siberut Island. It is distinguished from A. variegatus by its entirely opaque coriaceous tegmina, swollen suprahumerals, and a distinctly sinuate posterior process extending beyond the internal angles of the tegmina [2, pp. 13–14]. The type is a male, 6 mm long, deposited in the Raffles Museum, Singapore [2, p. 14].
In addition to the new species, Funkhouser records four previously described species with locality and collector data: Leptocentrus reponens Walker, Gargara attenuata Funkhouser, Gargara sordida Funkhouser, and Sipylus dilatatus Walker [2, pp. 13–14]. The brevity of the note—spanning only two pages—reflects the relatively small number of Membracid specimens obtained during the expedition, in contrast to the more substantial Fulgoroid material treated by Muir.
Fulgoroidea: Planthoppers and the Question of Endemism
Muir’s 1926 account [1] is the more extensive of the two contributions, treating 36 species across four families—Cixiidae, Meenoplidae, Delphacidae, and Derbidae—of which 26 are described as new to science, one remains unidentified, and nine are recorded as occurring elsewhere [1, p. 394]. The 72 per cent endemism rate for the Mentawi Islands’ Fulgoroidea is a striking figure, consistent with the biogeographical isolation described above [1, p. 394].
The new species are all related to other Malaysian taxa, and among the nine non-endemic records there appears to be a stronger biogeographical connection with Borneo than with any other region [1, p. 394]. Muir cautions, however, that the Fulgorids of Sumatra itself are so poorly known that firm conclusions remain impossible [1, p. 394]. One notable range extension is the genus Ostama, previously known from a single species and single specimen from Borneo; the new O. junctissima extends its range to Sipora, Siberut, and Pulau Tello [1, pp. 397–398].
The systematic section relies heavily on genital morphology—particularly male genitalia and, where available, female ovipositor structure—as the primary diagnostic character, with 34 figures illustrating these structures [1]. This methodological emphasis on reproductive anatomy reflects the prevailing taxonomic practice of the period for distinguishing closely related planthopper species.
Methodological and Taxonomic Approaches
The two papers together illustrate the standard taxonomic methodology of the late 1920s for Homoptera in the Malay region. Both rely on morphological description, with Muir’s work placing particular weight on genital characters as the principal means of species differentiation [1]. The use of 34 figures for genital structures in a paper of 21 pages [1] indicates the centrality of this approach to the identification of new species. The type specimens are deposited in institutional collections—the Raffles Museum, Singapore, being explicitly named for the Membracid type [2, p. 14]—ensuring the long-term availability of reference material for future revision.
The collaborative nature of the work is also noteworthy. The expedition was conducted under the joint auspices of the Raffles Museum, Singapore, and the Zoological Museum at Buitenzorg, with facilities provided by the Government of Netherlands India [1, p. 392]. The division of labour among collectors—Kloss, Karny, and Smedley, supplemented by native collectors—allowed coverage of multiple habitats across the archipelago, from sea-shore to accessible hills [1, p. 392].
Research and Documentation
The Society’s literature on Homoptera is concentrated in the mid-1920s and is dominated by the “Spolia Mentawiensia” series, a coordinated multi-taxa survey of the Mentawi Islands’ biodiversity [1, p. 393]. The two contributions—Muir’s 1926 paper on Fulgoroidea [1] and Funkhouser’s 1928 note on Membracidae [2]—are drawn from the same 1924 expedition and together represent the most substantial treatment of the order in the journal’s pages. The emphasis is squarely on island endemism and the description of new species, with the biogeographical argument that deep-water isolation produces faunal distinctiveness serving as the unifying framework [1, p. 393].
The records do not extend to other regions of the Malay Peninsula or Borneo, nor do they address the economic or pest significance of Homoptera in the region. The scope is strictly taxonomic and biogeographical, limited to the material obtained during a single expedition to a single island group. The high endemism rates reported—72 per cent for Fulgoroidea [1, p. 394]—and the identification of Bornean affinities among the non-endemic species [1, p. 394] point to directions for future investigation, but the existing literature offers no broader synthesis of Homopteran diversity across the Malay region as a whole.
MBRAS Sources
- W.D. Funkhouser (1928). Spolia mentawiensia: Membracidae, Homoptera. JMBRAS 6: 13–14
- F. Muir (1926). Spolia mentawiensia. Fulgoroidea. Hornoptera. Introd. C.B. Kloss. JMBRAS 4(3): 392–412
References
- F. Muir (1926). Spolia mentawiensia. Fulgoroidea. Hornoptera. Introd. C.B. Kloss JMBRAS 4(3): 392–412. Read on JSTOR
- W.D. Funkhouser (1928). Spolia mentawiensia: Membracidae, Homoptera JMBRAS 6(1): 13–14. Read on JSTOR